I have used
problem based learning (PBL) in a Campus based learning environment for several
years, both as a student and as a teacher. And from a personal view I would say
that a well-functioning tutorial group is a perfect example of good
collaborative learning. If different students choose different literature in
order to answer the same question, we should in theory achieve a good
collaborative environment. Different literature may have different answers to
the same question. This could in turn contribute to the development of
knowledge that is something more than just putting different pieces together.
So what are
the challenges for a PBL tutorial group? How can we support the group so that it
manage to work collaboratively? I would say that many of the challenges that we
meet in a Campus based environment could be directly translated into an online
environment. I read an interesting article by Capdeferro and Romero about frustration
in online collaborative learning. The authors argue that frustration is common
among online learners and that this has a negative impact on their studies. And
I must say that this is not really different from Campus based studies. I have
met a lot of students that are frustrated about the PBL group work. Until now I
have thought that this is the way it has to be. It takes a while to get used to
PBL so it is not strange that you sometimes get a bit frustrated. So, I have
looked upon frustration as an element that is part of PBL and nothing that you
can do anything about.
However, by
reading the article by Capdeferro and Romero I have realized that we really do
not want our students to be frustrated. It is bad for their studies and would
of course interfere with the ability of a group to be well-functioning and work
collaboratively. So, how do we make our students less frustrated? Capdeferro
and Romero have identified several factors that make online learners
frustrated. The most important factor seem to be connected to the contributions
from different students to the work of the group. Students get of course
frustrated if some group members do not contribute at all or just contribute to
a small extent. Once again, going back to a Campus based environment I experience
the same type of frustration with my students.
So, what
are the conclusions from this? Well, according to Capdeferro and Romero, frustration
could be decreased by teaching the students about group work and in this way
making them more competent in their abilities to work together with others. Also,
the teachers need to clarify what they expect from each student in the group
work.
Of course,
group work is complex and what I have focused on here are just a few points
that would have impact on group performance. But I think that if the students
know what we expect from them and if they have the skills to work in a group we
will definitely increase the chances for good collaborative learning.
Interesting text. I agree that we should not frustrate our students unnecessarily. There are plenty of opportunities for them to become frustrated anyway :) . Also, a good point about using different literature. It should increase the learning.
SvaraRaderaI agree with you that to some degree frustration is inevitable. Hardly any new competence is learned without some frustration, right? And i think it is up to us to continually figure out ways to reduce frustration. Part of that is simply acknowledging what can be frustrating maybe...?
SvaraRaderaposted by sunneeb@gmail above, not sure why it says unknown
SvaraRaderaSome great insights, thank - you for sharing. I agree we want students to benefit from group work, not feel frustrated by it. I feel the early stages of group formation and social bonding are key .. we as lecturers do need to "allow" for that in the early stages ... and how will we "team build" online or f2f? It does take some thinking & preparation but I believe the benefits to the group ultimately make it well worthwhile.
SvaraRadera